Forum:TC:Lego City

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Lego City

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 15:21, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Lego City (talk - history - links - logs)

A non-notable "secret area" for a non-canon video game. What more is needed? Oh, and it's an orphan page.--Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 00:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 00:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. SWGames would be a more appropriate location. Graestan(Talk) 15:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Kill per Grae and Stud precedent. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 15:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Per Culator. --Imperialles 15:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Non-canon, non-notable area. Merge it to the game, for Christ's sake. Havac 20:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Merge

  1. Creating a new option because, while it is somewhat SW-related (in that there are banthas and walkers in it, despite the swingset and fire station), it has no effect on the game's storyline and therefore doesn't merit its own article in my opinion. Gonk (Gonk!) 18:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. Just as valid as any other non-canon page NighthawkLeader 05:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  2. Agreed. The problem with an orphaned page is not that it exists, but that nothing links to it. That's an easy fix. And it appears in as a unique and distinguishable place in a licensed source, so therefore it can't be "non-notable". Non-canon, yes. Vape-worthy? No. Wildyoda 14:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  3. Per Wildyoda. Unit 8311 19:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
  4. Per Wildyoda. It also appears in TCS, so that's two notable sources. ~Roger Roger~ Home of the B1s 15:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  5. Every time you vote keep, a hyperinclusionist gets his wings. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 23:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  6. No longer an orphan. Non-canon but within a legitimate source. Please define non-notable in this case. And if you delete simply because of non-canon status, then you are setting a precedent that would force yourselves to delete all non-canon articles. The line must be drawn. -- Riffsyphon1024 23:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  7. Per Riff. There's a reason we have a big non-canon tag at the top of the page. Hobbes(Tiger's Lair) 23:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  8. Per Ataru and Riffs. jSarek 10:44, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
  9. Per everybody else. KEJ 17:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
  10. No. -- Ozzel 23:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  11. Per Wildyoda. Just because something's non-canon doesn't make it automatically non-notable. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 03:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  12. It may be non-cannon, but it should still be included. Thunderforge 04:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
    Cannon go boom. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  13. Greyman(Talk) 05:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
  14. —Xwing328(Talk) 18:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)