Forum:TC:Fan criticism of George Lucas

Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Fan criticism of George Lucas

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no consensus.—Silly Dan (talk) 01:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Fan criticism of George Lucas (talk - history - links - logs)

Per arguments stated here; this is an encyclopedia, not a debate forum.--Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 06:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete

  1. Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 06:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Imperialles 12:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Textbook POV pushing. QuentinGeorge 08:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Move any relevant and sourcable info to George Lucas. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 08:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. OR. Anything sourceable can go in George Lucas and the film articles for the films criticized. Havac 16:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Per Havac--Darth Oblivion 00:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. Per Havac. Graestan(Talk) 04:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  8. Per The Hav. Unit 8311 15:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  9. RedemptionRedemptionusersymbol(Talk) 16:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
  10. Per all those guys, and the fact that the fandom has always irrelevant to our primary purpose. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 01:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep

  1. To quote someone from the talk page: "Wookieepedia covers real-world reaction to Star Wars, so this article belongs here." My feeling is that this page could actually be viable, provided the thing is renamed (should be at "Fan criticism of Star Wars"), sourced, and purged of OR. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 07:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Statement: Keep per SN... and Wildyoda below. Snide comment: Keep purgism where purgism belongs.... in Wikipedia. KEJ 08:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Per StarNeptune. jSarek 21:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Per Star. Wookieepedia covers fandom too. Rename to less critical title, cite, cleanse, and keep the farkled thing! -- Riffsyphon1024 22:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
    • In addition, we are currently voting to delete Lucas bashing, but anything that is salvageable there and not OR should be merged to here. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. This article needs cleanup, not destruction. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 16:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. There is notable criticism out there beyond "Jar-Jar/the Special Editions/the NJO ruined everything forever waaaah." We just need to put it in this article, is all. —Silly Dan (talk) 01:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. Per Silly Dan and Ataru. Plus the fact that it's almost a show of POV to delete something like this. Wildyoda 20:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  8. Per Riff, Ataru, and Dan. Regarding Culator's comment above, covering fandom is indeed not our primary purpose, but it's currently among the topics Wookieepedia covers, and unless that changes, we'd be remiss to omit this content. Gonk (Gonk!) 15:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
  9. My thoughts on this anti-fandom agenda aside... This article needs citation (which would be work, but doable) and perhaps a good NPOV check, but I see nothing wrong with the concept. -- Ozzel 04:59, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  10. I have to say, it was difficult for me to decide at first, but now I say, "per the guys above." Tied. Marco Lam Jedi Order(Contact) 06:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  11. Keep or move to Fan Criticism of Star Wars.--Gonzalo84 02:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Comments