This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.—Silly Dan (talk) 03:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Dark Trooper Project (talk - history - links - logs)
I don't see the purpose for this article. What it says is repeated in Dark Trooper article, better and more thoroughly; not to mention that the other article explains the history of the whole project in more detail than this one. Someone should try to decide which information of the other article goes to which in order to expand it or just delete it. MoffRebus 14:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Merge
- Merge. It should be about the project, but the Dark Trooper article says more about the history and nature of the project itself than this article. MoffRebus 14:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. I tend to agree with the majority who considers the article for keeping. However after a week of voting, nobody considered improving the article. If the article is kept and still nobody is willing to do the dirty job, then merge would be the best solution. MoffRebus 22:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, since there was a vote for deletion going on, I'm assuming everyone was waiting to make sure that the vote closed in favor of keeping it before putting massive effort into it. Wildyoda 03:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. I tend to agree with the majority who considers the article for keeping. However after a week of voting, nobody considered improving the article. If the article is kept and still nobody is willing to do the dirty job, then merge would be the best solution. MoffRebus 22:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- MERGE. Why do we need a separate article? Look at Clone trooper; all the info on the project is within the one article, and I don't see why it should be any other way. --Azizlight 11:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Keep
- Keep, this is, or should be, about the project, while tha dark trooper article is, or should be, about the dark troopers themselves. KEJ 14:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and keep distinct. I think the History part of Dark Trooper can be moved into Dark Trooper Project and Dark Trooper left to distinguish between the three phases. Although the information runs together a little bit, each individual article just needs to be beefed up on its own particular set of information, not deleted. Wildyoda 14:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Wildyoda. Atarumaster88
(Talk page) 14:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC) - Can be made a distinct, though overlapping, article from other Dark Trooper-related articles. —Silly Dan (talk) 16:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Per everyone else. Unit 8311 16:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keepage. It's basically a campaign. Thefourdotelipsis 11:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Its not the best written, but I think it is something separate from the Dark Trooper page. Redjetta 21:44, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Kuralyov 03:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep the article has been greatly improved and while I made the deletion proposal, I think the new page could be kept alive and distinct. So... how do we close this thing now? MoffRebus 13:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- More keep. -- Ozzel 08:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per what they've already said. - JMAS 02:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
