Forums > Trash compactor archive > TC:Dan Biesel
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.—Silly Dan (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Dan Biesel (talk - history - links - logs)
We have articles on other notable fans. I don't know whether Dan Biesel is notable enough or not, but it looks arguable to me, so...discuss. Gonk (Gonk!) 02:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I imagine that it might be a vanity page. The creator goes by the username Dannydanger. I would have either have CSDed it or asked the user if it was autobiographical. I'll just go ahead and say delete for now. I tagged it, too. Love that vanity template. Graestan(Talk) 05:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm with Graestan. Delete. Stake black msg 13:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- The article's creator probably is its subject, yes, but that doesn't necessarily make it nonnotable. He did have work commissioned by Conan, and a quick Google search suggests he's pretty active in the fan community. I'm just unsure where we generally draw the line. Gonk (Gonk!) 15:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Biesel is not notable in the Star Wars community. He may be a big fish in the Conan fandom, but not here. Delete. --Imperialles 15:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. We've removed pages of fans who have made a lot larger contributions to the community than three images. If he ever does the cover of a licensed book, then he can have an article, but it definitely reads like a non-notable person and a vanity page to me. Delete. Wildyoda 18:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, Per Imperialles. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 18:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, delete. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Imp makes sense. Delete. Atarumaster88
(Talk page) 00:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
