Forum:TC:Chad Barbry

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.—Silly Dan (talk) 19:10, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Chad Barbry (talk - history - links - logs)

While this article may be relevant to Wookieepedia's history, it certainly isn't to Star Wars in general. All important facts are already present in the Wookieepedia article. --Imperialles 01:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Arguments for keeping

  1. He's as notable as most people in Category:Fansite webmasters. If you want to delete that whole category, than a CT on what exactly makes someone a "notable fan" would probably be a better place to discuss that. -LtNOWIS 02:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Details important to the creation of this wiki are located on Chad's article and not on the Wookieepedia article. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Y'know, one CT probably would have sufficed here. -- Ozzel 07:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. As long as we feel webmasters and website founders are notable enough to keep in general, then Greenwood and Barbry are definitely notable enough to keep in the specific. jSarek 09:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. Per Nowis and jSarek. If fansite webmasters aren't notable enough, that's another issue itself, but as long as we do that as our practice, he qualifies. - Lord Hydronium 09:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. Per argument on TC for Steven Greenwood. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 14:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. Per Riff. Unit 8311 14:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  8. Per everybody else. KEJ 17:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  9. Per above. —Xwing328(Talk) 01:27, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Arguments for deletion

  1. Per nomination reason. --Imperialles 01:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Any information that isn't in the Wookieepedia article should be. And fansite webmasters aren't notable. I'd personally support merging all of them into the articles for their sites, just like we do with fan films -- one article per film/site. Havac 21:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)