Forum:TC:Category:Terms

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.—Silly Dan (talk) 16:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Category:Terms ([[Talk::Category:Terms|talk]] - history - links - logs)

Is it just me, or would this category include a ridiculously large percentage of all of our articles? "Droid", "Corellian", "Star Destroyer", "Blaster rifle", "Yub-nub", and "planet" could all be put in this category, couldn't they? Any category that inclusive is not really helpful. I suggest removing this category. —Silly Dan (talk) 12:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Arguments for deletion

  1. Silly Dan (talk) 12:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. Per nomination reason. Delete. --Imperialles 13:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Ditto--Skippy Farlstendoiro 17:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. Yes please. Delete. Thefourdotelipsis 01:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. Glossary of common terms can be used if need be. Delete. -- Ozzel 08:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. Delete per nomination. jSarek 03:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. Delete per nomination. Next we'll have category: Things in Star Wars. Go figure. Atarumaster88 Jedi Order (Talk page) 14:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  8. Per Ataru. Unit 8311 14:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  9. The category itself could be useful but not in its present use. KEJ 17:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Arguments for keeping

  1. Keep. Some terminology is worth a full article, but doesn't neatly fit other categories. jSarek 10:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Could you give an example? —Silly Dan (talk) 03:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
      • All of the examples I was thinking of turned out to be in other categories. :-p jSarek 03:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Comments