This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.—Silly Dan (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Category:Banthas ([[Talk::Category:Banthas|talk]] - history - links - logs)
I'd just like to know what makes banthas so special that they deserve a category to themselves.--Lord OblivionSith holocron
16:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think that they are really "special", but that there are enough bantha-related articles that there is a need for a category. Ajrand 00:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep-Darthtyler
- Keep for obvious reasons. KEJ 23:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. If somebody made Category:Rancors and all we had in it was the Rancor article, I'd understand. But there are several different types of Banthas, so we might as well be able to find all of them from a single category. That's what makes them special: need for organization. Wildyoda 00:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with Wildyoda, They're special enough. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 08:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep per Wildyoda and Jedimca0.--Windu223 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for all of the above reasons. How's this even a question of deletion? —Xwing328(Talk) 18:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, honestly, what were you thinking Oblivion? -- Riffsyphon1024 22:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)