This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
C-class Protocol Officer (talk - history - links - logs)
The only source for this thing is the extremely broad "StarWars.com." Well, after much searching, I can't find anything about it there. It seems that this article is simply based on a CUSWE entry (with the same broad source). Now, I don't doubt Bob here, because StarWars.com has been known to delete things before. But, if we can't back it up with the actual source, then I'm afraid it should go. So I'm starting this in hopes that someone can find the page of origin, but if not, well... -- Ozzel 22:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete (unless properly sourced)
- Ozzel 22:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Vague, speculative, and sourceless. I like it!--Goodwood
(Alliance Intelligence) 23:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC) - —Silly Dan (talk) 23:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Graestan(Talk) 04:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm... KEJ 09:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Why are even bothering to vote about deleting this brilliant, wonderful, MOS-ignoring article? Unit 8311 18:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 18:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Per the rapidly-growing snowball up above. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 20:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yahoo! and google site:starwars.com searches reveal nothing remotely reminiscent of this article. Wildyoda 15:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
