Forum:SH Archive/A good article and a "dead" link

This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments or questions on this topic should be made in a new Senate Hall page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. 1358 ^(Talk) 16:39, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

So yeah, I didn't want to make two different posts, so I place both subjects here. I trust this doesn't go against the rules.

• First, Peto Kelsan. I trust this good article could be promoted to Featured article, since the word count is now over 1300. However, the original GA nominator has been long inactive. The question is, is it okay for someone like me to just go and nominate it, even if I won't add anything new for it? I'm rather unsure how we deal with this kind of articles. Normally it would be up to the original nominator, but since he is gone... how to proceed? Kreivi Wolter 11:29, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
  • You can certainly nominate it, as long as you are willing to take on the responsibilities of addressing any objections made against it. SinisterSamurai 16:07, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

• Second, the "Message Boards on StarWars.com". The link is still here, while the board is gone. It should be removed now, shouldn't it? Kreivi Wolter 11:29, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
  • This could probably be fixed lickity-split by an admin with no hassle at all. If nothing happens after a few days, and you still care, bring it up on the Noticeboard or make a CT. SinisterSamurai 16:07, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
    • Very well. Thanks. Kreivi Wolter 18:39, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
      • Darth Culator took care of the link. Might still be worth a discussion about which site, if any, should take its place in that paragraph. jSarek 22:57, June 26, 2011 (UTC)