Forums > Senate Hall archive > SH:Revan and the Star Maps
This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments or questions on this topic should be made in a new Senate Hall page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:34, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
What is the general consensus about the canonical path Revan took to find the Star Maps the second time? Do we go by Tatooine-Kashyyyk-Manaan-Korriban?--Jedi Kasra (talk) 14:44, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
I think that was the consensus, but I would check on that before you do anything. 69.161.76.157 17:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
I do believe that as well. Again, check beforehand. Gmalek 03:11, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- This what we have settled on because of the vision that Revan receives in the game regardless of the order the player completes the missions. There are no confirmed sources yet otherwise so this is all we have to go on. The Essential Atlas states the order that Revan and Malak found the Maps during their fall, but is strangely silent about the redeemed Revan's mission. So, all we have right now is this vision as it occurs in the game itself. I personally think that it is partially the mechanics of the game, but it is just as good of a pattern as anything else. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 03:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Good, that's what I needed to know. Now I can list Tatooine and Manaan as Nord and Bandon's places of death, respectively.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 23:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, don't be hasty. It's just a general assumtion, not canon. Artciles like Duel on Hrakert Station are hardly going to be justified by that alone. MauserComlink 14:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unless we make some template (to go on articles like the one Mauser noted) that indicates that we assume that order on Wookieepedia? Has anyone tried asking Chee? Nayayen
talk 15:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I believe it was asked years ago actually. He said that they try to avoid establishing not only the order in which Revan and the Exile visited planets, but their appearance and even alignment as well. The only reason they were given gender and canonical light-side ending was editorial, as they should have been refered to somehow in printed sources. MauserComlink 15:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- One could rewrite and rename that article to avoid any assumptions on the location of Bandon's death - which is the only reason I'm not deleting that article. The main part of the article would have to be short and vague, while the BtS section would have to explain the differing circumstances of the duels. —Silly Dan (talk) 15:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Mauser: Absolutely. It is an assumption. That was all I was saying. I am not saying it was canonical that way. That is the reason why we put it in that order, though. As of now, that is the only canon source that provides any order. So for now, it is what we have to work with. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- One could rewrite and rename that article to avoid any assumptions on the location of Bandon's death - which is the only reason I'm not deleting that article. The main part of the article would have to be short and vague, while the BtS section would have to explain the differing circumstances of the duels. —Silly Dan (talk) 15:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I believe it was asked years ago actually. He said that they try to avoid establishing not only the order in which Revan and the Exile visited planets, but their appearance and even alignment as well. The only reason they were given gender and canonical light-side ending was editorial, as they should have been refered to somehow in printed sources. MauserComlink 15:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unless we make some template (to go on articles like the one Mauser noted) that indicates that we assume that order on Wookieepedia? Has anyone tried asking Chee? Nayayen
- Hey, don't be hasty. It's just a general assumtion, not canon. Artciles like Duel on Hrakert Station are hardly going to be justified by that alone. MauserComlink 14:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- So we have to go by that assumption, what's the big deal with keeping the article in question where it is? What else can we call it? If the only given route in Tatooine-Kashyyyk-Manaan-Korriban, what's the big deal with following that?--Jedi Kasra (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Tatooine-Kashyyyk-Manaan-Korriban is the order the planets are listed in the flashback video during the "big reveal" sequence, and it's the numeric order of the modules in the game files. I'll check the strategy guide when I get home, but I think it recommends the same order since that's how you pick up the party members fastest. If all three agree, then I think we can call that definitive. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 20:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yep, Prima guide has them in that order too. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 22:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Then what's the problem with caling it "Duel on Hrakert Station"? We have the info Culator pointed out, so why can't we do it this way? It is assumed that the Jedi Exile traveled in the order the KotOR II strategy guide says to go.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
