Forums > Senate Hall archive > Image namespace
This week's improvement drive is a a little different. As proposed by Xwing328:
- 1) Tag all images with the {{Information}} template.
- 2) Fill in all required fields with the appropriate information (ie. description, source, licensing)
- 3) For sourceless images, tag the attention field with {{No_source}}
- 4) For unlicensed images, tag the attention field with {{No_license}}
So get tagging! -- Ozzel 06:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Addendum:
- 5) Hyperspace images are prohibited. If you find one, tag it {{Tlx|Ifd|Hyperspace image}}.
--Darth Culator (Talk) 01:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
==Summary==
{{Information
|attention=
|description=
|source=
|author=
|licensing=
|other versions=
}}
Questions/Comments
- In the attention field? Or in the appropriate field (i.e. no source in the source field, no license in the license field)? jSarek 07:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- The attention field, yes, so it sticks out more. That's what that one was designed for. —Xwing328(Talk) 14:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- I thought it was for noting special circumstances, such as an image having alternate versions. I don't think it stands out any more in the attention field that it does a little further down on the template, but that's just me. jSarek 18:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- The attention field, yes, so it sticks out more. That's what that one was designed for. —Xwing328(Talk) 14:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- What exactly is does "source" mean? How is it different than "author" or "licensing"? E.g. [[:File:'ed!.jpg]] has a LucasArts copyright stamp on it. Is LucasArts the source or the author? - Esjs(Talk) 01:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Should I even bother with images that aren't linked to? (Exhibit A: [[:File:001.jpg]]) - Esjs(Talk) 02:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Unused images are supposed to be deleted periodically. -LtNOWIS 02:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)