I do agree with you, since the sequels made Vader's chosen one prophecy obsolete, by bringing back Palpatine (even if he was a clone). Just one single thing destroying the point of the most important character in the Skywalker saga was bad, to say the least

@Ankushdaboss Anakin remained the Chosen One man, the Prophecy was not "invalid" with the return of Palpatine, Anakin brought balance to the Force as he said in The Rise of Skywalker

That was the plot hole. If he brought balance to the force all those years ago, then Rey would not need to be in that situation against palpatine

He only brought that the balance was "broken" so to speak, that's why he says "Bring back the balance Rey, as i did" all Rey did was restore the balance that Anakin brought in Return of The Jedi.

even though Anakin brought balance, it wouldn't mean the end of evil or the dark side. as Palpatine himself said to both grandfather and grandson "The dark side of the force is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural"

Nah I disagree, I think we’ve gotten some of our best stories and characters after ROTS. Clone Wars, Rebels, Jedi: Fallen Order, Rogue One. If your referring to movies and you didn’t like the sequels, that’s fine if it’s your opinion but I personally have been enjoying the Disney era greatly. I’ve personally been more into Star Wars in the last few years than I ever was in the decade between ROTS and TFA.

Fun fact: There are people who enjoy the Sequel trilogy and are grateful for these movies. If you don't enjoy the ST, that's perfectly fine. But stating that the ST have no reason to exist like it's a fact doesn't make much sense. To plenty of people, those movies made sense to the previous storyline and to the continuation of the saga overall. So, your conclusion that "Star Wars should have ended at Episode III" seems like a subjective argument, not an objective one.

Regarding George Lucas saying that SW was solely about Anakin/Vader's fall doesn't seem to make much sense, either, seeing that Lucas apparently planned on making a Sequel trilogy himself. So, really, I'd disagree saying that there shouldn't have been a ST to begin with. I think it's the execution rather than the idea that bothers most SW-fans. I've seen plenty of comments where SW-fans said that the film adaption of the Legends Thrawn-trilogy would have been better. So, although there is probably a part of fans who think there shouldn't have been sequels to begin with, I think most of those who are discontent about the actual ST bemoan the execution, not the idea of a ST.

And I personally enjoyed "Solo" and "Rogue One", so that's another reason I'd disagree with you that there shouldn't have been any further SW-movies

This is the type of post you keep in the drafts.

I think the only reason they made more is because George Lucas said that he would make 9 episodes of Star Wars. At least I’ve heard that I have no actual proof he said such a thing. But he’s I agree the should have stopped making movies after RoTS.

Are you talking about the Skywalker Saga or Star Wars itself? Obviously I definitely love a bit of Expanded Universe, with movies, comics, shows, and books, for any timeline; but yeah I absolutely agree the Skywalker Saga should have stayed as it was before 2014.

I've never been a fan of the "Such and such show should have stopped at such and such installment". My dislike of something shouldn't keep others from getting to enjoy it. I don't like the ST much at all but I don't begrudge anyone who does like it the chance to watch it.